Sparks said: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6561128 That post from Smeags. It rubbed me the wrong way. Calculated, insidious. All his posts give me this feeling, actually. See here also: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6562256 It feels rehearsed. Speaking with facts (lots of it repeated) instead of his thoughts or feelings. Careful not to say anything that may be traced back to him later. Also take a look at his "contributions" throught all this. Quite the opposite of Hylian's post, who I like for the record: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6559460 I want to hear the thoughts of whoever is willing to comment, please. |
I can't say I read it that way at all, to be honest. The first post flowed pretty clearly from the conversation, as I recall, and while I suppose you could read it as trying to backhandedly implicate conegamer I think the more correct interpretation is that he's stating how timidly he himself played the first time around, with the caveat that he was scum. The second post doesn't really raise much flags either. I kind of like that he's letting the facts speak for themselves, if that's what you're taking issue with.