kowenicki said: I really really HATE class actions like this. That said, I think they may win this. Some might say its semantics, but its also very clear what was said prior and what was said post are different. |
I have my doubts that they will.
If it was simply a case of not being 1080P and spitting out a sub-1080P signal then fair enough, but it's being dynamically controlled in engine to mux vertical frames, while the end result isn't as clean as a standard 1080P signal, the output is still 1080P.
Basically put it uses the engine and a pixel motion tracking formula to fill in the blanks in between vertical lines, outputting the result as a full 1080P image.
it's not truly native 1080P of course, but the SP being native 1080P and that blurry line between outputting 1080P through engine trickery and outputting a sub-1080P image I believe will be enough to get around the lawsuit.