Kresnik said:
@ italics, it should be judged by both franchises because it's a part of both franchise. It's called "Zelda Musou" in Japan. It's very much a part of the musou franchise as much as it's part of the Zelda franchise, and should be judged by that too. If you wish to give it a silver lining, by all means judge it against other Zelda games. Is it going to have anywhere near the amount of content as your average Zelda game though? If previous Warriors games are anything to go by - probably not. |
Well i disagree with those parts of more characters/etc with Ktay. I might of mixed up the fact i thought u were saying the game should be judged cuz of it has less characters (my argument being how can This game have that many characters O.o)
Other thing is i was semi agreeing its more fleshed out as it has some elements not seen in DW. That should be enough to differentiate the games with HW in a way...
I agree they should judge the game more based on DW series. But with all the eye candy, nostalgia, and added elements. I think it'll score higher than the normal DW games. That said, many will be upset if this game scores high, even in the low 80s.
Its a lose - lose situation no matter wat for HW. This is based on sales/score. Here look...
~Sales~
Sells badly: Meaning obviously terrible, "Bomb" and "Flop", waste of time etc.
Sells Great: "Only sold good because its LoZ Skin" and things amoung those lines
-Meta Score- Which seem to be wat will have never ending arguments
Low Score: Nothing needs to be said here
High Score:.....
