generic-user-1 said:
nintendo cant push out so many games, so they have to push out very desirable games tat have legs. the 3rd partys are gone since the GC has shown that people buy nintendo games and nt 3rd party games on nintendo consoles(and they had realy great exclusives at the start of the GC livetime, some are now multiplatts because they flopped on GC like RE4) |
And what were does Nintendo having good legs imply in Sony/MS having just 3rd party weak legs?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







