Sony: EA Access Doesn't "Represent Good Value To The PlayStation Gamer"

[NiKKoM]

kitler53 said:

on ps3 sony was offering games that were old.  games that most people already owned.   you'd get an occasional title day 1 but those were few and far between.   so far,. every game on ps4's ps+ has been brand new except towerfall i think.   for the first year you really have to offer brand new games.  i mean,.. it's like that there is a back catalog to even pull from.

i don't think sony can afford to get a brand new game like wolfenstein.  that would be too expensive.   now after that game has been out for a year than yeah,.. wolfenstein is probably an option.   i'm quite sure ps+ games will include many more old AAA once old AAA games exist on the platform just like they did on ps3.

and i mean,. compare ps+ to xbox one gwg's offering.  not only was it late to the party it's games are even worse.   ..i mean,. maybe not to you.  i know how you like smartphone games but the rest of us have lesser opinions of that kind of game.

haha.. I actually don't really care which games they offer.. but its interessting why this step has been taken by EA. Is it their greed.. is it Sony's greed not paying enough (anymore) for PS+ games, maybe there is a patern, or stuff changed when Sony switched to PS+ support for all 3 consoles.. maybe forcing publishers to have game available to all the systems they have.. it's not like EA did this cause it was a brainfart..