By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
walsufnir on 28 July 2014
Edit Thread
DerNebel said:
walsufnir said:
DerNebel said:

The people that spend the last months telling others this is a rip off or not worth it because it's not a substantial enough upgrade etc. I'm sure they hoped the game would be panned by critics for those things, looks like that ain't happening.

When people say it's a rip-off how would they change their opinion because reviewers gave super scores? The bad, biased reviewers nobody should care about anymore? If it's worth for people who double dip is their very own opinion. But I don't remember anyone saying the game itself is bad... The remaster perhaps as a remaster is but therefore we all have opinions.

It's not that they would change their opinion it's that they wanted reviewers to support their opinion, so they would be proven "right", there were (or probably still are) some people on here that would go as far as to call people stupid if they wanted to buy this, I'm sure those hoped for critics to deduct points for the game being a "rip off". A recent example of exactly that happening would be MGS: Ground Zeroes, people called that a rip off and reviews reflect that with the lowest score a MGS game has ever gotten.

Also to just add to Bureks point for a second (I won't dive into this any further Cone), I myself made a thread about the people complaining about TLOU:R and that got over 470 replies, a thread on here doesn't just get that amount of replies for no reason and there were several threads with hundreds of replies about this topic. It's really, really hard to deny that there has been a lot of hate thrown at this remaster on vgchartz.


Of course, exclusives always get fighted for and against the most. But many, many posts are defending and not offending. One post saying "nah, I won't double dip" can get you easily 6-8 "counter posts" so a thread easily gets blown up.