| alabtrosMyster said: Well, they had a couple of good news cycle. this one is not "news" this is a weekly video opinion piece, this week he is covering the 180s and his opinion on them. Sony other than the firmware updates being a little long in the hoven (still no DLNA and backward compatibility with PS1/2 sucks)... yet the PS4 as a consoles performs great, has a lot of games being released all the time and well, you normally don't have that question about a game's resolution on this machine, only the frame rates varies from titles to title... so people can concentrate on covering the games! If performane was a given on the xb1 there would be no discussion on this topic, everyone would be happy, since like 90% of the games available on xb1 are also on the PS4... they're better on the PS4 AND the PS4 has all these indie titles ALSO... well you get the situation we have now, where the legally blind buy xb1 and the people with good eyesight/glasses get a PS4. As of the Wii U, expectations are just different there (honestly if the console was 150 I would probably buy it). |
From people I know who have a X1 all your points are the same. The console works great, it does what it says on the box, their are games released for it all the time. So games do not run all the time at the same res as the PS4. Did people really care that much when games did not run at the same res on the PS3 compared to the 360. No, most people just enjoyed the games they played on their console of choice and let the fanboys rage over such stuff. People will buy the X1 because that is what they want. Most people do not purchase a 4/500 bone device just because one fanboy rant or another convinced them otherwise.
Even your post has a tint of the fanboy. All games do not play better on the PS4 and the PS4 does not have all the indie games either. These types of absolutes are just as bad as having another fanboy war with spec sheets and list wars.
