By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLXVER said:
kupomogli said:

Everyone's opinion is different, but my list is based off games I've personally played and completed, games that I can tell you that I've enjoyed.  Your list is full of games that you haven't touched, a couple that haven't even been released yet.  Not everyone has the same opinion on games and you may think many of the games you've listed, despite their good scores, aren't games you would have enjoyed.  I mentioned not listing Grand Theft Auto Liberty City and Vice City Stories because they're games I've completed but not really good games imo.

Not that it matters, it's your opinion.  You think the 3DS has a better library.  I think the PSP does.  Even if I have played games from both systems while you've probably never touched a PSP, an opinion is based on the persons perception. 


I own a PSP and have for many years. Ive also have had a 3DS since launch. Going by scores and sales, the 3DS has more, better and wider appealing games. Its not even close.

You think the PSP has a better game library? Thats fine, but dont try to justify it by saying that I dont know what Im talking about...

I edited it out before your post because it doesn't matter if you know what you're talking about or not.  Your list was full of games that you haven't played, noted by your comment that you haven't played them but they're highly rated games, plus games that haven't been released yet.  I edited it out because your opinion is your opinion, mine is mine. 

But anyways, you really think a high rating means the game is great?  Or a low rating means a game is bad?  Do you also parrot everyone else who says EA is the worst company ever?  Do you follow everyone else or can you actually form your own opinions?  Your post basically pointed out that the popular opinion of a game being high means it's a great game overlooking the fact that everyone, including yourself, has different opinions.

The point is, my opinion of the two consoles is actually an informed opinion.  I've played all the games myself.  I don't praise a games accomplishments based on a fanbase that is known to overrate every single first party to come out without even playing them.  I play the games myself and form my own opinion.  

--

*edit*

Monster Hunter has hardly changed from its original release back on the PS2.  Graphically it's about the same, just in higher resolution, gameplay is exactly the same with additional weapons, monsters, and different areas in t he newer versions.  You'd think the original being pretty much the same game gets the same score as the more recent games, right?  Nope.  Monster Hunter was scored less than 70 back when it was first released, and still scored poorly later on.  It wasn't until it started getting really popular in the west that it started scoring higher.  Most video game journalists are the biggest joke in the industry.  There are several things I could point out that make you realize that you should no longer listen to their reviews and just use  them for news and information but not going to bother.