bananaking21 said:
walsufnir said:
bananaking21 said:
so because its "anti social". i dont really give a shit, a lot of people play video games by them selfs, this is no big deal at all. |
That's your opinion, fine. Not giving a shit about all the text is something I can't agree with, though. He really makes some good points but well, he also doesn't like online gaming which many people also can't understand.
If it is a big deal I think no one can tell by now. Not you, not Fabian. But I think as he experienced a lot of implementations (and even did a lot himself for companies) and tried different hardware I tend to somehow take his words more seriously than comments that "don't give a shit".
|
again i dont give a shit. he has had experience with it and formed his opinion, i am waiting to have mine. i wont let one guy who has formed his opinion (even if its very well constructed and has a lot of good points) to make me not want to form mine. specially when their are legions of devs out there who are incredibaly excited for this medium.
he is predicting how the medium will evolve, and thats why he wants out. i for one, will wait and see how it actually fleshes out before commiting to it, and i certainly wont close the door on it because what one man has to say, hence, the i dont give a shit.
|
I guess I just had a problem with your wording. Giving a two-sentence answer containing "shit" while rygorous provided a well-written, insightful post on github containing years of experience with the tech is something which is, to me, inappropriate and not really thought through.
Of course he won't stop the tech nor will this prevent the tech to go where it will go, though.
