mornelithe said:
Between the time their first movie (Antz) released, and 2002, they had invested $455,000,000 in 6 movies, and grossed $1,298,611,099, those aren't small time numbers. I guess we'll just have to disagree on this one :) |
Dreamworks actually released 25 movies between that time. But that is mostly not relevent.
The 6 animation movies went like this:
YR/Movie | US | Foreign | Budget of production | Marketing (50% of budget)) |
1998 Antz | $ 90,000,000 | $ 81,000,000 | $ 105,000,000 | $ 52,500,000 |
1998 Prince of egypt | $ 101,000,000 | $ 117,000,000 | $ 70,000,000 | $ 35,000,000 |
2000 Road to Eldorado | $ 50,000,000 | $ 25,000,000 | $ 95,000,000 | $ 47,500,000 |
2000 Chicken Run | $ 106,000,000 | $ 118,000,000 | $ 45,000,000 | $ 22,500,000 |
2001 Shrek | $ 267,000,000 | $ 216,000,000 | $ 60,000,000 | $ 30,000,000 |
2002 Spirit | $ 73,000,000 | $ 49,000,000 | $ 80,000,000 | $ 40,000,000 |
$ 687,000,000 | $ 606,000,000 | $ 455,000,000 | $ 227,500,000 | |
Theatre Revenue | 1,293,000,000 | |||
40% of Revenue | 517,200,000 | usual take home of Movie | ||
Cost of production +Marketing | 682,500,000 |
|
The debate really is about what percentage of the revenue is actually profit. As the theatres take a chunk of that. Also, Dreamworks used other companies to do their distribution who also took a chunk.
I agree with you that if you take just Revenue and basic budgets, it would seem to be much more profitable than you would expect.
But, that is not the total of costs or profits.
It is near the end of the end....