EspadaGrim said:
Chris Hu said:
I think overall they are highly overrated especially since they almost lost as many titles as they won and five of those where won when the team was in Minneapols. Also they really should have changed their name when they moved since I'm pretty sure that there aren't any lakes near Los Angeles.
|
Even if you take away 5 they still have the second most titles in the NBA and with the whole Lakers name it's way to late now because it's a known brand Worldwide even if the name doesn't make sense.
|
It actually nice they lost all those titles they will never catch up to the Spurs winning percentage in the finals. Also right now I would give the Spurs a slight edge when it comes to post Bulls dynasty teams since they only lost once in the finals and the Lakers lost twice and the Spurs actually took care of those pesky Pistons. Too bad Malone wasn't wise enough to sign with them during that season he would have gotten that elusive ring he actually deserved to win at least once.
