Landguy said:
I didn't see anything in the documents indicating price fixing. That was conjecture by either the OP or the person who wrote the article. What I did see was a number of companies that have many different divisions that work together in business. Because of those relationships, they have an understanding about communicating if they want to poach an employee or to not "raid" (exact word in the documents) their companies and take large chunks of emploees at one time. Sure, if the companies had no involvement with each other, this would be criminal in nature. But, even then it is common to let companies know that you are fishing in their pond - out of courtesy. |
At the very least, I'd say it's safe to say they have a case they can bring before the courts, just like the Silicon Valley employees' class action suit against tech colluders currently before the courts. The judge can decide if these communications were illegal or not.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







