Remasters aren't bad, but having the one major summer first-party game be one is.

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

I just hate the fact that its less than one year old and its the only first party game during the summer... I don't think anyone has anything against the game considering how 2013 was basically last of us awards but its just come on... One year old game? Really? If you are gonna remaster a game, remaster one that needs a remaster like how Microsoft is doing (can't believe I just said that)... Heck, their Master Chief collection includes 4 games and games like Halo 2 needed a remaster cause it looks like shit this day and age...

Like I get it, Its a business decision... People on the ps4 don't have much to play right now and the last of us looks really good graphically so there isn't much work to be done compared to older games so its an easy cash grab and almost guaranteed sales but if thats all it takes for people to rebuy the game, then maybe Sony's logic of having a handheld filled with mostly ports isn't as crazy as I thought it was

And then the other obvious argument is, well, what about the people that havn't played it, now its their chance to play it and it is a valid argument but the issue is that once again, they could have chose something else to remaster that needed a remastering... I am sure Sony has a library of games that people would eat up if it gotten remastered and I really hate cash grab tactics which this whole industry seems to be filled with..

If you want to rebuy or buy the Last of Us on the ps4, than more power to you but just remember if you are "rebuying" the game that its the little stuff which people support that grows to be a pain in the ass in the future (Just like how Mandatory Online payment, cash grabbing DLC, Micro-transactions and etc are)