Dallinor said:
The HD DVD players for $250 don't give a great picture quality. You need to buy a $400 one for it to deliver the goods. This is just a woeful effort to twist numbers. So they sold 60% of the stand alone players with a year's headstart against blu ray. Yet had we checked that figure a month ago, they probably had 65% of the standalone player market. So then, after excluding the PS3 numbers from the first statistic, they then seem to go full loop, and include the PS3 numbers for their second statistic, in an effort to make the attach rate look better.
|
I wasnt doing the comparison with a HD DVD player, was doing comparison using the ps3 running a blue ray movie on different TVs and running the same movie on a DVD on those same TVs.
I havent tried HD DVD comparison because I dont own any HD DVD players.
one thing though, the avg joe dont care much about which players have better quality, the only thing they'll notice is the $200 price mark compare to the $499 price mark, of course for tech geeks, we know the $200 model got avg quality compare to$300 model HD DVD players.







