By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
walsufnir on 07 July 2014
Edit Thread
eva01beserk said:
walsufnir said:

mind said:


No, it's your "logic" makes "mine" look that way.

I only said "partly", do you know what "partly" means? Probably not, too, well, it means 99,9% as well is 0,01%, get it? The other guy said it's not true at all, which means 0%, and that's why he is flat out wrong, it simply can not be that way(almost zero probability, less than if it was 100% true in that situation), but "Partly" it is, no matter how you look at it.

 

That's the only thing i said, "Partly".

 

Give us *one* example. Just one. And don't post stuff like "common knowledge" - we are many people here with "common knowledge" and don't see what you are going to use for your "common knowledge" and "logic". You are just evading the discussion with this nonsense.

If you read the thread then you would see many examples where given. BUt the only proof that you are willing to accept is that the devs or phil spencers comes out and says "yes its true, MS is paying us to keep parity" wich will never happen and you can live in denial saying your right.


Not even one.