Mr Khan said:
Richard_Feynman said:
Mr Khan said:
1) The GameCube didn't get the third party support of Xbox, despite Xbox selling equally terribly.
2) Monster Hunter's sales on Wii/Wii U make a decent argument. The market for rigorous ARPGs is there.
3) Hindsight is 20/20, of course, but these publishers were acting with *foresight*. They decided, absent any sales, that Wii U did not deserve full third party support. If Wii U had come roaring out of the gate, these games still would not have been made.
4) Bias is all over this industry. I'd be almost as inclined to buy it as an argument than appeals to "rationality."
5) How many game-breaking bugs will Witcher 3 have, day one? Hell, check this out. http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2659901
The "ship now, patch later" mentality is what Rol is addressing specifically.
|
1) Nonsense. The GC shared many, many 3rd party games with PS2 and XB and had many 3rd party exclusives - just like the XB games you are referring to. Which games were on PS2 and XB but left GC out in the cold? Come on. Is your list significant?
2) Monster Hunter is a MASSIVE series. "Decent" is NOT good enough.
3) I don't accept this point as worth responding to.
4) " Bias is all over this industry. I'd be almost as inclined to buy it as an argument than appeals to "rationality."" You're attempt at lofty speech is not going to intimidate me into accepting your statement as having worth. Indeed, I see this statement as worthless and embarrassing.
5) How about you wait till Nintendo releases a game as vast as Elder Scrolls before saying ANYTHING about patching. You'll eat your hat if Nintendo starts patching then I presume?
|
1) The biggest of them all: Grand Theft Auto.
2) It's one of the top-selling third party games on the platform. That doesn't amount to much overall, unfortunately, but it shows that Nintendo gamers favor Dark Souls-type gameplay explicitly over other third party offerings.
3) My point, then.
4) I suppose i'm being a bit disingenuous there. The point of the story is that a lot of third party developers have gone on record as being very dismissive of or outright hateful to Nintendo. Their opinions do count towards how the companies themselves function in the long run, though there comes a point where rationality wins out.
5) How about discussing the multitude of third party games much less ambitious in scope but just as bug-riddled? What of EA UFC?
|
1. that actually hurts your argument. Xbox got a LATE release of the games. and the only reason they got that was because MS WENT to RS and secured it. Thats what you are supposed to do. Nintendo didnt do it. So whose fault is that?
2. I think there are big enough differences between MH and Dark Souls to be substantial. Thats like comparing Tekken to Smash Bros.
4. Hateful is a strong word. Evidence. Cause Sony got actual hate for the PS3 at one point.
5. What does this have to do with the subject at hand?
