Why Nintendo shouldn't suck up to third parties

[TruckOSaurus]

Train wreck said:

Anfebious said:

Not even close, one has, at least, data to back it up and has some legs to stand on. The other one comes from your own twisted perception.

Conditioned and Forced are two different things. You are the one twisting.  Force is something that is immediate while conditioned is acceptance over a long period of time. Im in no way saying that Nintendo forced consumers to buy their products.  

Im sure over the past 25+ years buyers of Nintendo products have accepted Nintendo's high level of quality and polish and that over the same period 3rd parties have not given them that, so it only makes sense that their software would rise over that of others and turn their consoles into "Nintendo games for Nintendo systems".  Sony has promoted its massive library over their own offerings, and while their offerings sell well, its not surprising to see 3rd parties top their list.

And correct we know that candy crush is over what, 300 million sold/downloaded, quality title right there.

If Candy Crush was crap nobody would be playing it and King.com wouldn't be swimming in money. They crafted a game that responds perfectly to a specific demand i.e. games you play when you have a few minutes to kill. They managed to tweek the challenge and gameplay in a way that people keep coming back to it and are willing to spend money to get a few extra moves to finish a level or to purchase special items.

It's not a gaming masterpiece as most people on here would define it but it is a quality title in what it intends to do.