Rayman on sale and platformer discussion.

[Experimental42]

naruball said:

toot1231 said:

naruball said:
Yeah, definitely agree. Rayman Legends and Origins are by far my two favourite platform games. The lack of story doesn't bother me at all.

With Mario it's a bit different. I don't care that it doesn't have a strong story, just that it's the same one one again and again. Also, the whole stereotype of women needing saving from men. I'm sure that worked fine in the 80's but times have changed. I wish they would come up with a new simple story.

Im not putting words in your mouth look its right there.

"I do not care about story in games"

"but with mario thats different I do care now"

For the love of God. In Rayman there's almost no story - I'm fine with that

In Mario there is a story, one that I find bad. If it had no story, I'd be fine with it. If it had an almost non existant one, again, I would be ok with it. Since it does have one and it's bad (imo) it bothers me.

Can you not compehend the difference between no story and bad/annoying story?

Not only do you need to seem to get such a simple concept, you make it about Ninty, which I did not mention as having a problem with. So if I mention something bad about Little Big Planet, it's because it's Sony? No! I'm talking about a specific franchise.

The plot of _______ is that  _________ kidnapped ________ and you must save the day by running and jumping.

Mario and Rayman have the exact same base story with just a few names changed. I assume you can now see how it looks like you're judging Nintendo critically because they're Nintendo?