By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vasto on 29 June 2014
Edit Thread
Tamron said:
Vasto said:

I am done talking about this subject. Its a difference between performing better and purposely making something run worse on the competition.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/watch-dogs-pc-patch-on-the-way-as-nvidia-and-amd-quarrel/1100-6419996/

"i done talking about this subject so heres a link to further push my opinion anyway"

Try actually reading, or turn off your selective reading for a while.

"I've heard that before from AMD and it’s a little mysterious to me. We don't and we never have restricted anyone from getting access as part of our agreements. Not with Watch Dogs and not with any other titles," he said. "Our agreements focus on interesting things we're going to do together to improve the experience for all PC gamers and of course for Nvidia customers. We don't have anything in there restricting anyone from accessing source code or binaries. Developers are free to give builds out to whoever they want. It's their product."

 

 

No thanks, this has been discussed everwhere so you belive what you want to belive. Nvidia is getting beat by AMD in every way becuase they are not better. $1000 Titan beat by a $600 R9. Sony and Microsoft choosing AMD over Nvidia because AMD is better. Nvidia having to change their entire pricing model of their cards to compete with AMD.

Always listen to the people.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=169950&page=1