Mr Puggsly said:
Yeah, Metacritic is still useless for this discussion. Sales has more impact on continuing an IP than Metacritic. I agree, Ryse being a launch title helped make it a success. But that's isn't the sole reason it did well. Look at Knack, that was a launch title available to a bigger audience. Yet Ryse sold better than Knack (excluding Japanese bundle of Knack). Hah! "I had the class." If you had class you wouldn't do so much MS bashing. You just annoy people with that crap, that isn't class. |
Metacritic is not useless to the discussion because it is an aggregate as I said before. If Microsoft believed review scores were useless they wouldn't have barred reviews until the release date of Ryse instead of letting them come in a week earlier. They know review scores affect sales which is why these days people have been accusing companies of paying off reviewers (namely IGN). Sales impact the continuing of an IP, but reviews and aggregates tell the opinions of the people who played the games and Ryse was a slightly average game based on user aggregate and media aggregate. Its better that first party fails than paying a third party to make crap for you. Just shows how much Microsoft pays attention to the track records of the companies they pay.
In your situation between you and me I respected your opinion. I don't care about what you think of between me and a group of people. Thats a pretty sad way to think.







