Conspiracy! Titanfall, EA, and Activision

[BreedinBull]

theprof00 said:

BreedinBull said:
That's a real stretch. The only part that is hands down is no way COD:AW could copy Titanfall in such a short time, so information crossed streams (giggle) at some point before in development of them both.

How is it a stretch? I agree that it's...imaginative, perhaps conspiratorial, but a stretch? Stretch implies unlikliness.

Vince was the CEO of the company that makes CoD. They were fired for trying to sell information and property to other companies (which would likely be EA, seeing that the biggest rival to CoD is Battlefield, by none other than EA).

Now this game comes out which was made quickly, has all the same features as a CoD game that had to be in development for at least a few years (while Vince was still CEO)...it's funded by EA (CoD maker's biggest rival, and MS (who has paid for timed CoD:MW DLC exclusivity since forever)

Sure I know crossing streams happens. It happens a lot in the movie industry too. But this stream starts at the very top of Infinity Ward, and ends with the very same man at a rival house. This isn't crossed stream. This is one man taking a piss at two different places!

Stretch? Hardly. Conspiracy. Yes

 

No, I feel stretch is used well there. I was going to aplogize but after some research, I'll stick with stretch. You do raise some good points, but the "vince and cohorts tried to sell..."...is a bit of a stretch :P