By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Max King of the Wild said:
cannonballZ said:
naruball said:

What about the people who over praise anything Ninty related while saying that say that other exclusives don't come close? Why is one pathetic and other not?

I didn't see anyone downplaying anything. Just people interested in experiences that Ninty can't provide. Games like Halo, Uncharted, Infamous, Heavy Rain and The Last of Us. Nintendo does great what it does, but it does not offer experiences similar to the ones the games that I mentioned offered. Nothing wrong with that, but I hardly see how that is downplaying. For people in realistic graphics the options on wiiu are limited. How is that downpplaying when people are mostly interested in those genres?


First, it wasn't aimed at you or what you seem to be talking about. I am a multi console owner and play everything! 

Second- No downplaying?...."Well, if you want something to look better than something else just put qualifiers in. Such as exclusives when the multiplats arent on wii u anyway"

I happen to think Nintendo games are quality, I enjoy them a lot. I also enjoy the games you mentioned, I have them all. 

Third, Realistic graphics aren't the only thing people are after. Sony and MS both offer great titles that aren't realistic graphic wise. If Mario went 3rd party, it would sell a shit ton on other consoles. A good game is a good game regardless of what it looks like. 

What I said was valid. Say you have system A with 10 exclusives with 90+ metacritic and System B and C share 100 games with 90+ metacritic that aren't on system A... Which is the better library when comparing A to B or C?

I believe the OP refers to exclusive titles for each individual console. You are saying that multiplats that aren't on Wii U are now considered exclusives because-  they are only on competing consoles?