Value proposition. MCC vs. LoU remastered

[Teeqoz]

platformmaster918 said:

Teeqoz said:
I belive that when most people talk value, they don't talk about what one game is priced on PS compared to what the other game is priced on Xbox, I think they talk about the amount of playtime you'll get out of the game. If we go by that definition of value then Halo: MCC wins (I assume, since it's four games vs one).

Then why don't the 3 or 2 game collections on PS3 that were 1080p 60fps for all the games get as much praise for their value as MCC?  Ratchet 1,2,and 3 with 3's multiplayer (since people are making such a big deal about Halo 2 MP) for $40.  Yet no one brought that up as some amazing example of value.  Maybe Sony should have made a big part of their press conference about it.

I own all the three PS3 HD collections you mentioned in the OP, and I agree that they are great value. For me R&C collection > Halo MCC, but Halo has a larger fanbase, and therefore it gets more attention. However, the example in the OP is TLOU vs Halo MCC, and I just think Halo has more content than TLOU.