| MikeB said: @ rukusa IF Fallout 3 has TRUELY become PS3 exclusive then Sony will be on the right way to regain respect from the "hissing" gamers in the US. Im certain that Sony still has not given up on the US and they probably need something of that magnitude to stun perhaps their competing marketleader Microsoft. IMO depends on the fashion Fallout 3 would become exclusive. Sony bribing the developing company IMO wouldn't gain respect. If the game just makes more sense on the PS3 for example due to technical reasons or in the future due to install base like was often the case with the PS2, close partnerships, etc, now that are more positive reasons. I don't like bribing, I wanted Bioshock on the PS3 and this was actually under development and planned, IMO this was really bad for consumers and for me Microsoft lost credit (I admit, not that they had much to begin with for me). Paying to just keep Fallout 3 off the 360 wouldn't be applauded by me, paying for additional development time or priority development would be a different matter. |
You know that Stigma in the US going in circles "the PS3! It has.... NO GAMES!"? .... it would be put to shame.
Thats the respect I believe would be gotten from the american gamers.
Well my source is reliable, and I believe you "know" who he is.
Alright, Im willing to wager my first ban-bet on Fallout 3.







