Crytek In Deep Trouble – Adoption of CryEngine Not Good, Ryse Development Catastrophic (Update: Crytek denies claim)

[TheBlackNaruto]

SWORDF1SH said:

kupomogli said:
All Crytek was really at was developing games and making them look good. Gameplay was average at best. They're like a third party Guerilla Games.

I don't think there is much wrong with the gameplay of Killzone, it's actually quite solid. What Killzone does have in common with Crytek games though is bland stories with bland characters. Killzone is fine if you just want to go around shooting but you never feel like you're envolved within the story and the result is that you lack purpose of why you are mowing down the enemy. 

I actually agree. I love the gameplay of the KZ games. It is very solid indeed. It is not as "loose" and does not give you the freedom on movment that Halo or maybe COD does but it feels great playing it. The story has SERIOUS potential GG just sucks at character development and doesn't seem to know how to tell the story though lol. 

Kz2 and KZ:SF are two of my favorite MP FPS out. So it is not the gameplay that is the issue IMO as you said it is the story and characters. 

On Topic:

I just like the way Crytec makes games look while the gameplay is usually pretty bad smh.