Aielyn said:
I think you might be looking at this from the wrong perspective. Nintendo have a tendency to have their hand in development of the hardware for their system in a way that neither of the others do - that is, where Sony might use their computer division's "Cell" processor, it's just a regular Cell processor. Both of them tend to go for relatively "stock-standard" parts, while Nintendo tends to want something specifically designed for what they're doing with their system. Now imagine them working with Crytek's guidance on what functionality needs to be in the next system. Crytek would know exactly what kinds of computations need to be fast, etc, to optimise the system for their kinds of engines. So it's possible that the union of Nintendo and Crytek would result in the development of new hardware optimised for gaming in a way that no previous hardware has been. And then Crytek would be able to develop for that new hardware, and do so exclusively, thus eliminating their need to handle many different architectures. |
You mean, the same way Sony worked with their dev teams and 3rd parties to make PS4? ;)
Honestly, I don't see why Nintendo would need Crytek for that.







