impertinence on 19 June 2014
| Max King of the Wild said: By the way, here's Oxfords definition A person who pretends to give an impartial endorsement of something in which they themselves have an interest. Should we bring up Reggie's statements comparing Nintendo, Ms and Sony systems acting impartial? I assume we can agree he has an interest in the system. Like it or not Reggie = shill |
Fascinating. You prove yourself to be wrong with your own reference, yet are so pathologically incapable of admitting that you were incorrect that you ignore all common sense and logical structure to avoid having to face reality. This skill should serve you well as you progress through life...
User was moderated for this post - Conegamer
