padib said:
impertinence said:
What you fail to take into account is that the goalposts are very fluid in this case.
Reality is simply that Nintendo can't sell systems without third parties. Facts that contradict this natural law are anomalies and flukes, facts that support this natural law doesn't exsist but are still powerful evidence. Finally, you completely overlook the important emotional proof. Obviously it feels like Nintendo can't sell systems or games without third party support, so it is definietly true.
Hopefully this clears up the confusion somewhat.
|
You can't clear up something that was for me absolutely clear since the start, and it's that Ucell as well as a huge majority of people have a fantasy of the actual situation which causes them to interpret the data in a way that fits their emotions.
|
Aaah, I see. My post was an attempt at humerously supporting your point. I realize that you see this situation the same way as myself, and used some sarcasm to put the point across. I guess my intentions were not clear.