By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran said:
DerpSandwich said:
If the mention of a single-player mode sold a lot of people on the game, the mention of it being a full retail title turned me off to it. A $20 eShop primarily multiplayer game would have been fine, but I don't want to pay 60 bucks for something like this. It might be different if the campaign is huge and amazing, but I get the feeling it will just be playing against bots.

But then, I'm a cheap bastard, so...

God forbid you pay €60 for a game that could possibly entertain you for many hours. 

Never understood why people don't want to pay as much for games centered around multiplayer yet are completely fine with paying that price for a single-player campaign of 12 hours. 

It's a principal thing.  I like to pay for a game based on how much content they crafted, because I feel like that takes a lot more work to create.  Plus, there are tons of games with both a robust campaign and a multiplayer mode, so paying full price for just the multiplayer to me seems like a gyp.  I wouldn't even pay full price for something like Titanfall, and that's got however many bazzilions of dollars put into its development.  This game is something I would expect to see on XBLA for $15.  I'll fully admit that I can't make a final decision until everything about the game is revealed, but I don't think the fact that I'll spend hours on it with my friends makes it more worth the money, because largely we'll be making those hours, not the content creators.  By the same logic it wouldn't matter how much the game took to develop as long as it takes up a lot of your time, so you could charge $60 for something as simple as Tetris. 

That's just me though; I like to be pretty frugal and weigh all my purchases.  I'm kind of a freak.  XD  And I certainly I don't look down on people who spend differently than I do.



Currently playing:

Bloodbath Paddy Wagon Ultra 9