Samus Aran said:
I study history and the believe that you need to look at the past to fix all our problems isn't widespread in the academic world anymore. Of course what you say still remains true, but only to a certain extent. You could compare history to research journalism. Knowing how to find the sources, transcribe/translate the sources, being able to think critically and weave everything together, being able to write on an academic level, etc are some of the important trades a historian learns. These things can be applied to contexts outside history, like journalism for example. Another reason why people study history is because of curiosity of where we came from, in order to understand our present situation better. For example, in order to fully understand the volatile situation in the Middle-East you need to know your Islamic history, going as far back as Muhammad himself (even further actually). |
Didn't say you can correct all the mistakes of humanity by studying history, but to deny it's value is foolish... And I'm not only talking about 'Academic History', but the study of past trends is the basis to estimate future trends. If you don't analyze data from the past (even in History you could analyse lost war, tatics used, etc to enhance your army and win future disputes, while ignoring past mistakes you are just exposing yourself to redo them) from where will you take data to "predict" the future? I like the saying, smart people learn from their mistakes wisdom people learn from other people mistake.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."