By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 17 June 2014
Edit Thread
Mr Khan said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Mr Khan said:
SubiyaCryolite said:
The only ports I'd consider "bad" are those with low or inconsistent performance and I'd blame Nintendo's R&D department for that.

We're talking about the ones with removed modes of all sorts, more. Like Splinter Cell Blacklist missing co-op, or Arkham Origins missing multiplayer.


They do that because they know its not worth the investment with Nintendos installed base. These people watch consumer activity and pay attention to sales. 

Again, though, cyclical. If they give the platform the inferior version, why not expect Wii U owners to go elsewhere? And if you're then encouraging them to go elsewhere, why develop for Wii U at all?

It's the same madness to do with Call of Duty on Wii U, really.


They develop for the Wii U because Nintendo asked them at the last minute. This is why they get late ports. The DLC is based upon the sales. I believe DLC isnt even worth it if your sales are below a certain point.