By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic on 17 June 2014
Edit Thread
Dark_Feanor said:
Intrinsic said:
Dark_Feanor said:


Both smell the same for me.


So you are basically saying that for all we know the PS4 sold much less than what the smelling neogaf numbers are? Or maybe even more? Cause disputes like that is a two way street you know....

I don't know, but I am sure you are thinking more of the former. Call it a hunch.


As I´ve said before: there are things we know we don´t know.

We know PS4 lead may sales again and that is all. Even the WiiU 60k figure is based on another last year leak.

I would love a prof that one of those insiders are accurate. It´s easy, show one of those leaks with any console HW sales BEFORE Microsoft or Sony disclaim their sales.

I can tell you that most of Neogaf insiders on the NPD thread are just doing math on previous years numbers, some of those also not full disclosure.

The obivious thing that is easy to figure it out with the 95% HW sales increase is that PS4 and XOne are selling about the same as the 360 and PS3 were selling last year, probably less.

Think you are just trying to make something outta nothing. I am not arguing with you, just pointing out that this net of doubt you seem inclined to cast can work in either direction of sales numbers.

And you seem to be looking at that 95% hardware increase in a very strange way. Unless i am mistaken, it means that there is a 95% increase on hardware sales of available platforms on the market this year when compared to last year right? So how is it "obvious" from that stat that the PS4/XB1 are selling "about the same" as the PS3/360 and you even went as far as to add, "probably less".

I don't know what your agenda is, or why; nor do I know what point you are trying to make, but I think its clearly obvious that there is bias in your seemingly insightful data analysis.... cause you seem hell bent on making every number lend credance to your specific opinion. Damning veery other fact to stipulate the opposite to hell.

Its one thing to argue numbers or the validility of them as the case may be, its another to do so with malintent simply cause you may not like a brand. One is admirable the other is pathetic. I am not saying you are doing one or the other, just saying it seems that way.