| Squeezol said: I disagree with everyone who says Nintendo should own Sonic. Heck no. What good would that do? Nothing. I don't see how a Mario-like Sonic would work. Lost World was close enough. |
Who said 'Mario like'? Because that would be fairly poor a call. Sonic is as different from Mario as Kirby is. - Granted that does suggest that they'd be willing to keep Sonic as a 2D game like Kirby is, not to say that would be a bad thing. Still I think SEGA have layed enough ground-work that Nintendo could take the highlights (like combining racing and platformer ideas, and adding mutliple paths) and make a very well done game.
That said if they did decide to take more inspiration from Mario than SEGA have in recent years (give him a Princess to save, give him more power-ups, give him cylindrical levels - only one of which really enhanced things, namely Colours) I'd LOVE a 3D Land esque Sonic, it would basically play like a 2D Sonic with a 3rd dimension.
Actually I'll take Sonic 3D Land and Kirby 3D Land if its not too much hassle.
