justgames7604 said:
now now, i never said they are going for 70? why do you say this....... i never said this was anything bad either. the title of the thread itself is pretty misleading.... as are the quotes from naughty dogs. as it seems like they are aiming for something alot higher than 60fps. That is all. 'Naughty dogs working hard to Push the Last of US on PS4 past 60fps' He also never says anthing youre saying here, he just says that: We are coding hard over the weekends with our Naughty Dog graphics team to push The Last of Us past 60 fps. all we get from this rather ambiguous statement is that they are reaching above 60fps, does it say anything about locked 60fps like youre saying? why is it ok for you to infer things but not me? If we go off of the statement my first response is justified in the fact that it sounds exactly what it sounds like: they are aiming higher than 60fps as they didnt say anything that youre saying. |
@bolded. Uhmm because that's what you said in your previous post? "all i said is if they are aiming for something higher than 60fps, like 70 for example..." http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6421346
@italic That's just your assumption, nowhere it is implied they are going "alot higher than 60fps" just that they are going past 60fps, that's an illogical assumption.
@underlined No it doesn't, but keeping this in mind http://www.computerandvideogames.com/458378/the-last-of-us-remastered-targeting-60fps-on-ps4/ said by Neil Druckmann, with now knowing they are trying to push above 60fps, and knowing how games work, and that you can't go past 60fps on a TV, it is logical to assume that they are going for locked 60fps framerate. That's why it's ok for me to infer things.
And btw. Corrine Yu is a woman.
So it is happening...PS4 preorder.
Greatness Awaits!







