Aielyn said:
I'm not going to waste time arguing further with you. You cherry-pick, and then proclaim that I'm the one cherry-picking. You ignore my actual argument, and then attack me personally for using examples when all I needed to do was show that examples existed. And now you're pointing out that GE and NMH were "late ports"... but of course, Wii never, ever got late ports that were then pointed to as "see, games don't sell on Nintendo systems", right? Oh, and CoD3 sold better on Wii than on PS3. And Force Unleashed 1 sold about as well on Wii as on PS3 and 360. Splinter Cell? You mean the game that was rated 85 on metacritic for 360, 78 for PS3, and 61 for Wii? Or the game that was rated 82 on metacritic for 360, 84 for PS3, and 75 for Wii U? Of course, you demand that I use examples of games that released day and date together because you know full well that very few of those actually exist, and most of those involved the publishers heavily advertising the other versions and ignoring the Wii or Wii U versions. CoD: Ghosts, for instance. Check out the advertising... http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2013/04/pvca85ul.jpg In all of my searching, I managed to find a total of one ad/catalogue that mentioned the Wii U version. Yet you think it's Wii U owners' faults that the game didn't sell well? |
oh please, so two wrongs make a right? Just because people make silly arguments doesnt mean your silly argument is justified. AND i gave you a few examples where the games werent late ports and still sold way less. explain.
Nonsense LOTS of games were released day and date you just dont want to use them becasue your argument falls apart. Im not blaming WIi U owners of anything. Clearly the demograph isnt there, as most people interested in those games rather play it on another system. Now with that being said, why blame 3rd parties clearly the games wont sell as well as on the other systems so why even bother. THey should just not try live and let live.
