MDMAlliance said:
Samus Aran said:
Zod95 said:
Samus Aran said:
Zelda looks graphically better than anything you showed on PS3. I dare even say it looks better than a lot of XBONE or PS4 games. It has a great artstyle, something you can't say of GT5 or even that trailer from the Last Guardian which didn't look remotely special to me.
|
SubiyaCryolite has pretty much said everything regarding this comment of yours.
Art is a different matter. You very well know that I said "a piece of 7th gen tech". "Tech" means technology, which is different from art.
|
All the games you showed looked mediocre and bland. Zelda looks better. A lot better. You need the technology to make your artstyle come alive, otherwise you end up with Skyward Sword. I guess you people just look at the character models and scream "OH MY GOD, not realistic!".
To me Destiny also looks like a piece of 7th gen tech, but you don't see me constantly spouting that around lol. Am I really to believe that game has a budget of €500 million? What a waste of money, 80% of the budget probably went into marketing lol.
|
I say ignore Zod, as he's known for being quite biased against Nintendo (as seen with some of his previous threads).
I imagine he thinks he's speaking objectively, but quite honestly I know that he isn't. So it is a waste to argue with him because he wont budge from his position, even if you objectively prove he is incorrect.
At the same time, though, you aren't using the best argument to begin with. Art style definitely matters when it comes to this. On the technical side it looks different, but the evaluations I see being made are ninjablade-esque.
|
I just care about how the game looks. Don't care for the technical aspect, if it looks great it looks great. Obviously a more powerful console can produce more technically advanced games. But like I said, for me, Zelda U trumps a lot of "next-gen" games. Based purely on how it looks through my eyes. :)
