Scisca said:
@Bold - this doesn't matter. As I've said, both games are bad. At least KZ is a true exclusive, but that also doesn't matter much. They are both bad and thus make no difference. @Italics - this is not an opinion. MS has nothing on Sony's first parties. Even if the quality can be comparable is the case of the flagship games, the number of such games can't even be compared. MS can't and won't pump out as many great and diverse games as Sony does. This is not an opinon, it's a fact backed up by years of track record. It is your opinion that you like MS games more, but the fact that Sony's offer is larger, more diverse and better (this last criterion I base on metacritic ratings, which are higher for Sony PS3 exclusives than X360's exclusives). It's a given that this will repeat this gen, cause Sony's 1st parties > MS 1st parties. @ Japanese games - yeah, MS bought a handful of games at the start of last gen. It wasn't worth it, if they really want to repeat it, they'll be just losing money again. Also XO is no X360 and is even less attractive for Japanese devs. @underlined - if there are differences, the games aren't identical. Yes, higher resolution and less screen-tearing make for a better looking game, that's exactly what better graphics consist of. An extra 60 minutes of gameplay also makes a big difference and makes the PS4 version higher value for your money. These games ARE NOT identical. The PS4 version is superior and you get more for your money. Fact.
This is not an opinon, it's a fact. You pay less for a more powerful hardware - fact. Even with the Kinectless version you get more HP per $1 with the PS4 ;) When you buy WD you get better visuals (and will get them better from other 3rd party games as well) and an extra hour of gameplay for the same price - fact. You will get more 1st party games on PS4 than on XO and Sony won't abandon the support as fast as MS, the games will have better graphics than MS 1st party games - I would say it's a fact, though it's "only" an assumption with a 99.(9)% of chance of becoming true. Good enough for me. |
its an opinion not fact. not everyone prefers Sony exclusives for first party over MS ones. they re gamers who prefer the ppposite. thats a fact. At this moment, 6 mohts into the gen, MS has more First party AAA and thast not counting the ones being released this year that we know of. You do know there are people who rate games on metacritic for the sake of lowering the score if you are basing on user score.
Actually MS already announced 3 exclusive japanese for xo and anounced that there will be one more revealed at E3. also they announced that they have 4-+ develpers making games for XO. Thats pretty good so far. http://www.vg247.com/2014/04/23/xbox-one-japanese-release-date-announced-40-developers-pledge-support/
The extra amount of screen tearing on Xo is so small that is hardly visible. ii seen my brothers ps4 version adn compared with mine XO version. Even DF didn't say the difference in screen tearing were tiny. so really its jsut teh small resolution difference. The texture quality and AA re all identical. even the foliage are identicla and so is the shadow quality. the difference is hardly like the difference between RDR ON PS3, Fallout 3 where it was beyong just teh resolution difference, but also frame rate difference, texture quality, shadow quality, draw distance and so on. thats what you call a hge difference which made 360 the sueprior one.( thats a known fact) This gen the diffeence is minute.
Again the visuals for WD on boht consoles are identical even to the texture quality and AA MS still sypporting xbox 360 and is still doing well. At the moment in term o first party titel, MS is leasing the pack. it may change when sony announces more. Whether it will have better graphics ,, thats your personal opinion. ps ryse is considered to be the best looking game when next gen launched and got nominated at teh dice awards for its graphics. ( thats a fact :) )
