Zekkyou said:
You're missing the point. How do you know FH2 won't be penalized for being too similar to the first? How do you know the map won't be less interesting because they had to make it bigger? How do you know the events won't be more repetitive since they have to make more of them? How do you know it won't be criticized for not feeling "next gen" enough, like infamous was? How do you know expectations won't climb too high then not be met? The answer to all of these is you don't. It's perfectly reasonable to assume FH2 will be better than the first, and i agree with you that it has a high chance of being so, but it's not at all reasonable to say "LOL nice joke post" to someone for predicting it's final meta won't be the same as the first. Games aren't rated simply on how good they are compared to their predecessors. |
We already know that Horizon 2 will not be anything similar to the first game (except for the 360 version which will proably have a lot of less feautres then the X1 version). So there is no way it can be penalized for being too similar to the first game. We already know that the events will not be too repetative either since they added new showcase events to the game one that is already know about is where you race against a train.








