By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Captain_Tom said:

So that's it.  Because it was sold at an incredibly slight loss it is not following a similar strategy?  Yeah I didn't know what you were talking about because it was completily moronic.  Just because one thing is different, doesn't mean these things aren't true:

-It was launched with inferior processing capabilities that held it back to last gen ports.

-It's online capabilities and features are more than a generation behind the competition.

-It uses very little energy and comes in a small package.

-It has "Wii" in the name lol.

-It has an unconventional gimmick as its main selling point.

At the end of the day, any business is about the bottom line. So if two products, like the Wii and Wii U, differ so significantly in the effect they have on the bottom line, it has to be asked what the cause of that is. Calling it the same strategy is dead wrong in such a clear case. You go on to scramble for similarities between the Wii and Wii U (just like Soundwave did) in an attempt to uphold your belief that the Wii and Wii U used the same strategy, but that's a futile effort when the most fundamental part differs so greatly.

In order to come to any sensible conclusion, you first have to admit that you were wrong. Only then will you be able to provide a reasonable analysis.

Who's scrambling?  The similarities are obvious as night and day.  If it is your opinion that they didn't...That's fine, even if you are in the minority.  But don't say we don't know what we are talking about when we bring up several valid points of comparison.