| Faxanadu said: no, my position is crystal clear. Contrary to you, I dont believe RE5 needs to be on Wii because Nintendo consoles "own the rights by heritage" to have every main RE game released on them. |
I never said Nintendo owns the rights by heritage. I merely said many Resident Evil fans and gamers feel that way.
| Faxanadu said: That is what I argued against and still argue against since this claim is absolutely ludicrous. |
It was never a claim myself, just explained one reason why people want it on the Wii whether justified or not.
| Faxanadu said: You claiming RE:Wii not equal to RE4 or me not being able to play RE0 and hence not liking it are just little attempts to shift focus from the pathetic claim you made. |
You were the one who brought up the issues that led to discussion of RE0 and RE4:Wii so you only have yourself to blame for that.
Also, may I iriterate that I made no claim myself, only offered one reason among many why people felt it should be on the Wii. You asked why people wanted the game, and I told you, simple as that. I'm not sure where you ever garnered the impression I was presenting it as a fact or sound inarguable logic. All I ever did was defend the fact it indeed did have a stronghold at least equal to if not greater than that of the Sony brand, not that I necessaraly believed it myself.
| Faxanadu said: Very simple: RE belongs to Capcom. They can do what they want with it, including releasing it on a non-Nintendo console. |
I could have told you that. Why you needed to make such a long drawn out discussion just to make a point no one was contesting is somewhat confusing.
