Watch Dogs : Kotaku review

[Aerys]

Conegamer said:
Well that review is way off the mark. It may not be perfect, but it's still very fun and has a lot of good ideas. And it's far from a "NO", that would make people think it's a bad/broken game, which it really isn't.

Funny how a thread was made for this review only, whilst the dozens of extremely positive reviews were shunned and assumed. People are just looking for a reason to downplay this game it seems.

I dont need a reason to say what the game is since i played it, this review is almost exactly what i think, that spare me the trouble to write it and i bet Kotaku will be more trustable than a random guy on vgc, the game is entertaining but very repetitive and almost everythign they say is true, the game has too many flaws on gameplay, story, variety. Maybe the no is a bit exaggerated but at this price, it's obviously no, better to buy it at 30-40$ , doesnt deserve full price.

 

We could say it's a good beginning considering it's their first gta like but that wouuldnt help them to improve the game, because it need a lot of improvements. Like we wont judge good a combat game with very few characters just because " it's the first  game, let them the time to create more characters in the sequels" , no we judge the game for what it is, and obviously, it's compared to other gta like.