Million said:
totalwar23 said:
Million said:
sc94597 said:
Million said:
HappySqurriel said:
because the difference between the PS2 and Wii is similar to the difference between the Wii and the PS3. |
Technicaly ? Saleswise ? No . |
Technicaly. Yes. The wii is about 4-5 times more powerful than the ps2, and the ps3 is the same times more powerful than the wii. I am going to post this again so I could get your attention. http://malstrom.50webs.com/birdman.html |
If your talking about theoretical power then maybe ( even though I'd still be doughtfull of the Wii being theoreticaly 4-5 time more powerfull the the PS2) in practice many Wii games have PS2 and in some cases sub ps2 graphics. Mainly 1st party titles exceed PS2 but not 4-5 times as much. |
And you're complaining of people comparing the PS2 to the Wii? You're doing it yourself. |
that's incredibly unfair , I was disproving some one who was clearly incorrect . I didn't start a thread about it. |
Clearly incorrect?
The Gamecube was certainly more powerful than the PS2, and by some estimates was (at least) twice as powerful; the Wii is certainly more powerful than the Gamecube, and by some estimates is 2 to 4 times as powerful. This puts the Wii as being (at least) 3 to 4 times as powerful as the PS2 ... The XBox 360 and PS3 are (roughly) about 4 times as powerful as the Wii.
You're just as guilty as all the fanboys you complain about ...
