Stever89 said:
I also believe that both Microsoft and Sony said that a Wii look really nice besides their 360/PS3. It was almost like everyone was getting a long. Until the Wii started selling more than the other two combined. Then it was like "oh they aren't in the same league." Or something like that. |
Well basically what I was saying to Montana is that what is real and what the companie's PR things are most likely going to contradict. I mean from all PR, we know there is going to be some bullshit. Nintendo said a lot of things early on how they are really going for the casual and earlier that was great, until recently they've had backlashes from the hardcore. Now everytime they talk about the Wii they say it's great for both the long time gamers and ones just getting into it. So you can never believe what PR says directly cause they have an agenda like the rest of us. There agenda is marketing, and they use the best strategies.
Same thing with MS and Sony early on. They really didn't see the Wii as a competitor. And they actually used the Wii early on as somethign to attach themselves too. I mean they thought the early success was jsut a fad but they still wanted to feel somewhat connected to it. Thus you saw MS PR saying how great the Wii is and how awesome it is to have one next to a 360. And Sony did a similar thing. Using it to to say get these 2 but not the other. But then the Wii kept selling, and now they state well its really not something that'll keep ya going very long or it'll die out later on, so instead get my console that'll be here for awhile. Once again PR changing with agenda and marketing strategy. And sometimes I feel people get way to caught up in what they say. I like to analyze what they say to see what provokes them to say this, then we can really see what they are thinking. Otherwise its' well though out bullshit. But its' not reality.








