Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
If you think that's funny because you think it's wrong, then please, don't start writing for a comedy show. I really can't tell what you mean though, so: Assuming you were being serious, which I almost can't imagine: lifetime profits of Sony's gaming line annihilate Microsoft's. It's such a truism that I'm not going to go search for the numbers for you. Anyone can, and everyone here knows it's the truth. And if you divide total profits by years in the business for each company, same result: Sony FTW, M$ teh suck. Didn't MS just turn their first yearly profit? And the profit was bullshit anyway, because it didn't count the $1 billion in costs for all the returned RRoD and otherwise bunk consoles. And to any whose hate-filled MS hearts want to say, "PS3 is different tho, it'll lose money, it's a failure." No, it will make sh*tloads of money by gen-end. Great success. Don't forget, Sony made PS2 also. If Sony was so interested in having PS3 beat PS2, Sony would discontinue selling PS2s. Most self-evident thing ever, but some insist that PS3 < PS2 in sales equates to failure for Sony. Did y'all go to business school with George W. Bush? LOL. And if you weren't doubting what I said, pretend I was arguing w/ someone who laughably did. Cool. |
I was laughing because while Sony was profitable with the PS1 & 2, they lost back almost their entire last decade of earnings over the past two years.
Great business model. MS should pick it up right away. Not to say that MS has a better model, they don't, but it's hardly sunshine and roses for Sony.
PS. I bolded that part because once again, you're just spitting out pure comedy. It shouldn't surprise me though; I've found that intelligence is inversely related to screennames that bash or praise a company or product. Keep carrying that torch, though. It suits you well.
Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/