makingmusic476 said:
rocketpig said:
It's great that people are picking up PS3s solely for Blu-ray functionality, but does that help Sony much now that the HD format battle is over? A few things: 1. These early adopters might or might not buy any games.
2. The Blu-ray selection is still, let me put it gently, limited. If blockbusters of yore were being released frequently, Sony would have an easier time selling more movies and make more money.
3. The PS3 is still either sold at a small loss, is breaking even, or is making a small amount. Either way, it's pretty much a stalemate as far as profits are concerned.
4. By the time the movie selection is improved enough to start generating real sales numbers (and profit), standalone players will surely be cheaper than a PS3.
5. If someone is an early adopter/audiophile, they will probably buy another BD player at this point and it will be a standalone unit. So, Sony used the PS3 to trojan horse the BD format. It worked. Good for them. But unless these people start buying games or loads of movies before standalone players drop below the price of a PS3, Sony either lost money on the PS3 sale or broke even on the deal. It was a ballsy move to win the format war but as far as the PS3 is concerned (and its game selection, third developer support, and extra revenue needed from licensing), this isn't a particularly good situation for Sony to be in. |
They'll still make money on every Blu-Ray disc sold, whether it's to a ps3 owner or not. Also, if ps3 sales hold up as standalone player prices drop, then we'll know that all system bought from that point on will be bought with the intention to purchase games. And it's not like multiplatform titles have been selling horribly on the ps3 compared to the 360, given the current install base disparity. About point #6, are you'll saying that they'll buy a standlaone unit in addition to their ps3, or to replace their ps3? |
