fps_d0minat0r said:
I love how you are acting like nintendo are immune just because their network hasnt been hacked yet. You fail to understand that if anyone wants to hack a network, the value in nintendo's network is puney compared to other targets. That mean its better than the networks of the companies which the hackers do attack. I'm not sure why you are finding such a simple point so hard to understand. edit: btw I cut the quote tree otherwise the mods will come. |
I never said Nintendo is immune to anything. I just recognize the scent of a BS argument. If Anonymous' goal was money, then who would have lost a penny? Some-one. The point of the attacks wasn't money, the point was to be assholes with no real objective, kind of like your first post.
Saying the value in Nintendo's network is puney compared to others is like saying the value of the Milwaukee Bucks is tiny compared to the LA Clippers. The former just sold for $550 million. To even be considered a candidate for acquiring the latter, you have to open discussions at $1 billion minimum. The value of the Bucks is puny compared to the Clippers, but is $550 million not a big deal all of a sudden?
Let's review the timeline of our posts:
Your 1st post: Flamebait
My 1st post: Flamebait response
Your 2nd post: Unsubstantiated claim with more flamebait in the form of a strawman argument
My 2nd post: Existential question followed by sarcasm that returns the argument back to my first post
Your third post: Downplay of the seriousness of the issue
My third post: Awareness of the issue in the big picture followed by a personal attack
Your fourth post: Another unsubstantiated claim and another attempt to draw attention away from the original subject
My fourth post: Callout of your unsubstantiated claims that have no historical basis, along with using the flamebait from your second post for the lulz.
Your fifth post: I'll just some it up with #14 from a cool little thread I know called "VGChartz Logic"
14. "If you don't agree with me you must not be listening to what I'm saying." (credit to RavenXtra)
14.1 "If you actually understood what I was saying, there's no way you'd disagree with me - because nobody who can understand what I am saying could possibly have a different point of view: mine is the only correct opinion someone who had all the facts could make!" (elaborated upon by VitroBahllee)
14.2 "If somone disagrees with you and you exlain your point, but they still won't change their mind, there's only one possible explanation: problem with their reading comprehension" (credit to naruball)
So basically we can sum up your feelings like this: "Nintendo's network sucks, it's not even worth hacking, and if it ever was hacked, there's absolutely nothing Nintendo could do about it, because Nintendo's network sucks. A network's security strength is determined solely by how awesome it's interface and online community is, so OBVIOUSLY if Sony could get pwned, YOU KNOW Nintendo would. Not that it matters, because it sucks to much to be worth hacking."
OK, cool, got it. Your opinion has been heard. Thanks for your valuable contributions to the forum. You're a credit to us all.
