Faxanadu on 26 March 2008
| dschumm said: Sounds great. The best/most popular sites find ways t oleverage theri community talent. This is a much better/different way of expanding than being more like the traditional game sties. One thing that I suggest, and it merely because a lot of people whine about it is the game rating systems. I think you should have to be logged int ot rate a game and it should only let you rate a game once. Then you keep track of ratings on peoples pages and on the game pages. YOu Could look at someone's total ratings and see if they skew too far one way. It would be like gamerankingg or metacritic but each person on the site would be a review source. This traceability would discourage people from giving only 1s and 10s. Also any game not released should have it's rating locked until it is released in one territory. Now that you have moe people involved in the database this can be implimented. Keep up the great work, |
Sounds good but also like a lot of work.
Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.
The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.
