By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Sounds great. The best/most popular sites find ways t oleverage theri community talent. This is a much better/different way of expanding than being more like the traditional game sties.

One thing that I suggest, and it merely because a lot of people whine about it is the game rating systems. I think you should have to be logged int ot rate a game and it should only let you rate a game once. Then you keep track of ratings on peoples pages and on the game pages. YOu Could look at someone's total ratings and see if they skew too far one way. It would be like gamerankingg or metacritic but each person on the site would be a review source. This traceability would discourage people from giving only 1s and 10s.

Also any game not released should have it's rating locked until it is released in one territory. Now that you have moe people involved in the database this can be implimented.

Keep up the great work,



Final* Word on Game Delays:

The game will not be any better or include more content then planned. Any commnets that say so are just PR hogwash to make you feel better for having to wait.

Delays are due to lack of proper resources, skill, or adequate planning by the developer.

Do be thankful that they have enough respect for you to delay the game and maintain its intended level of quality.

*naznatips is exempt