sc94597 said:
bigtakilla said:
sc94597 said:
bigtakilla said:
Who said no one? Dem assumptions (read above to see what was really written).
There's a lot of people on the forums that will also say Majora's Mask is their favorite, so what? I'm talking about universal acclaim, not what a group of people on a forum say. Go to Square-Enix's website, everyone on there will tell you XIII is the second coming of Christ, lol.
|
How does one objectively measure universal acclaim?
|
Usually common knowledge, like FFVI and FFVII being the best Final Fantasies, not just myself and about 12 people I know prefer this game to that.
Are you implying that Twilight Princess is as popular as OOT?
I can at least show you out of around 1200 people, OOT is rated higher critically (being one of the highest rated games by professional critics of all time).
http://www.metacritic.com/game/nintendo-64/the-legend-of-zelda-ocarina-of-time
http://www.metacritic.com/game/wii/the-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess
I'd add A Link To The Past, but there is no scores for that.
EDIT: You'll also note Universal Acclaim (which I didn't even know they put until now lol) directly underneath where it says User Score.
|
Factor in Twilight Princess's Gamecube scores as well, then.
(1280*90 + 371*92)/(1280+371) = 90.44.
But we also must consider these numbers are rounded. And we also must consider outlier votes like this one, in both cases.
Score of 0,
""For Zelda is only 1 game with a 'Million' Dresses," - Ben Yahtzee Crosshaw
I ahve to agree, sometimes there's a water mechanic, a 3d machanic, a sidescrollin' mechanic, a transformation mechanic, a music machanic, a 1st person mechanic, ECT ECT, But by this point we've seen all the dressed and now they're just old ugly peices of fabric that no-one wants to look at it anymore, and when I was going to recap this game so I could review, I beat it within 7 hours and didn't bother caring about anything, so I can't give a Game I didn't give a **** about a score, can I?"
Right.... he beat Twilight Princess in 7 hours.
|
Yeah a 90.4 (or 9.04 when converted from percent to whole numbers) is still smaller than 93 (or 9.3 cinverted to whole numbers). What point was there in that?saying that out of around 1700 people (making the averages even closer to each other than just compairing the more popular title) is worse than the 92 I was trying to give you. Something is telling me you seen 90.4 and thought it was a bigger number than 93, lol.
Also Are you implying that Twilight Princess can't be beaten in 7 hours?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn0JIM1nUDc
Now you could be saying he skipped through the text, which is true, but text doesn't take 3 hours to read, lol. That's all besides the point though.
