S.T.A.G.E. said:
Soundwave said:
In a lot of ways -- yes.
I think Microsoft squeezed Nintendo out of the core market and convinced Nintendo that they couldn't compete head on in that area because they are much smaller company than MS.
And while being the alternative game company served them well for a few years, they've lost the casual audience to iOS/Android gaming now too ... which leaves them in a very difficult position now.
If MS didn't exist, IMO Nintendo would be a much more balanced company today, making more games for core gamers (rather than being at the mercy of more unreliable and fickle casuals) while still making the same ol' Mario/Zelda/Metroid games that everyone enjoys. |
Microsoft saved Nintendo from Sony's wrath.Nintendo was on a path to being destroyed by record setting numbers in the gaming industry and losing massive chunks of marketshare. Since Microsoft has been basicallu warding off Sony, Nintendo has been making their own plans. Nintendo would've gone down with the ship had Sony not been distracted by Microsoft.
|
I think if there was no XBox, the GameCube would've sold at least 30+ million units, a healthy amount and then they would've built off that and seized on Sony's mistake of making a $600 PS3.
To be honest the game industry wasn't good for Microsoft anyway ... here we are, almost 15 years later, and MS really is back to getting worked over by Sony and still has not made proper inroads anywhere globally outside of North America.
And the reason MS entered the game biz in the first place was because they were afraid Sony was a threat to their Windows stronghold, but they actually were blind to the real threats ... Apple and Google are the ones that they should've been keeping an eye on.
And Nintendo got pushed into a direction, which was temporarily successful for them, has in the long term (IMO) made them weaker.
I think Nintendo would've been just fine being a profitable no.2 in the game business, even the N64 made a good amount of money for them.
